The puzzling excess of gamma rays from the centre of the Milky Way probably originate from rapidly rotating neutron stars, or millisecond pulsars, and not from dark matter annihilation, as previously claimed. This is the conclusion of new data analyses by two independent research teams from the University of Amsterdam (UvA) and Princeton University/Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The researchers’ findings were published on Thursday, 4 February in Physical Review Letters.
In 2009 observations with the Fermi Large Area Telescope revealed an excess of high-energetic photons, or gamma rays, around 2 GeV (gigaelectronvolt) at the centre of our Galaxy. It was long speculated that this gamma ray excess could be a signal of dark matter annihilation. If true, it would constitute a breakthrough in fundamental physics and a major step forward in our understanding of the matter constituents of the universe.
However, many other hypotheses have emerged in recent years, suggesting the gamma ray excess in the centre of our Galaxy might have a more ordinary, astrophysical cause. Possible origins for the observed gamma ray excess range from the activity of the supermassive black hole in the centre of our Milky Way and star formation in the central molecular zone to the combined emission of a new dim source population in the galactic bulge.
New statistical analyses of the Fermi data by Dr Christoph Weniger, assistant professor at the UvA, and a research group from Princeton/MIT, now strongly suggest that the excess emission does indeed originate from unresolved point sources. The best candidates are millisecond pulsars, the researchers conclude.
Millisecond pulsars, or rapidly rotating neutron stars, were often formed billions of years ago. They are among the most extreme objects in the Galaxy. A population of hundreds or thousands of these millisecond pulsars must be lurking in the galactic centre, hidden from detection due to present day instrument sensitivity. Future radio surveys with existing and upcoming telescopes (e.g. Green Bank Telescope, Square Kilometre Array) will be able to further test this hypothesis in the coming years.
In their analyses, the UvA and Princeton/MIT researchers each used a different statistical technique, ‘non-Poissonian noise’ and ‘wavelet transformation’, to analyse the Fermi data. What they found was that the distribution of photons was clumpy rather than smooth, indicating that the gamma rays were unlikely to be caused by dark matter particle collisions.
According to Weniger, lead author of one of the papers, this is a win-win situation. ‘Either we find hundreds or thousands of millisecond pulsars in the upcoming decade, shedding light on the history of the Milky Way, or we find nothing. In the latter case, a dark matter explanation for the gamma ray excess will become much more obvious.’
Mariangela Lisanti, assistant professor at Princeton University and one of the authors of the second paper, adds: ‘The results of our analysis probably mean that what we are seeing is evidence for a new population of astrophysical sources in the centre of the Galaxy. That in itself is something new and surprising.’
Richard Bartels, Suraj Krishnamurthy and Christoph Weniger: 'Strong support for the millisecond pulsar origin of the Galactic center GeV excess’ in: Physical Review Letters, (February 4, 2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.05104
Samuel K. Lee, Mariangela Lisanti, Benjamin R. Safdi, Tracy R. Slatyer and Wei Xue: 'Evidence for Unresolved Gamma-Ray Point Sources in the Inner Galaxy' in: Physical Review Letters, February 4, 2016, http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.05124\
A hires image is available
Gamma ray picture of the Milky Way, as seen by the NASA Fermi satellite.
Inserts: two independent statistical analyses showed that the distribution of photons is clumpy rather than smooth, indicating that the excess gamma rays from the centre of our galaxy are unlikely to be caused by dark matter annihilation.
Image courtesy to Christoph Weniger, UvA - © UvA/Princeton
Christoph Weniger, University of Amsterdam, firstname.lastname@example.org +31(0)20525 6294
Mariangela Lisanti, Princeton University, email@example.com
University of Amsterdam: Jacqueline de Vree, firstname.lastname@example.org
Princeton University: Catherine Zandonella, email@example.com